If we look at neighboring disciplines such as economics, political science, and management studies, psychological research has had a much more profound impact within those fields of inquiry.
We envision a broad variety of other research questions in public administration that can be addressed in the spirit of behavioral public administration. The idea behind this theory is that a representative composition of the workforce of a bureaucracy in terms of gender and racial and ethnic diversity can promote democracy in various ways.
In this article, we aim to deepen the dialogue between public administration and psychology by outlining a distinct approach in public administration that integrates both fields of study: behavioral public administration.
Another interesting option would be to expand the possibilities for doctoral minors between public administration degrees and psychology departments.
This subfield is characterized by a plurality of theories and methods borrowed from psychology. Fourth and finally, we conclude with an agenda comprising four guiding principles to further develop a behavioral approach to public administration.
Despite its benefits, experimentation has its own potential pitfalls. Experimentation Public administration scholars have recently started using experiments more frequently Anderson and Edwards ; Bouwman and Grimmelikhuijsen ; Jilke, Van de Walle, and Kim The emergence of the interdisciplinary subfield of political psychology has gained prominence in the period since the s Lavine Comparisons between control and treatment groups can determine what would have happened in the absence of red tape or lower degrees thereofwhile the process of randomization ensures the statistical equivalence of experimental subjects.